- Published: 3 August 2021
- ISBN: 9780141987057
- Imprint: Penguin Press
- Format: Paperback
- Pages: 336
- RRP: $26.00
Calling Bullshit
The Art of Scepticism in a Data-Driven World











- Published: 3 August 2021
- ISBN: 9780141987057
- Imprint: Penguin Press
- Format: Paperback
- Pages: 336
- RRP: $26.00
A modern classic that is troubling in some places, sobering in others, and enlightening from beginning to end. . . Bergstrom and West leave the reader feeling a very particular kind of smarter: the empowered kind. . . It works anywhere, for anyone: the academic, the citizen-scientist, citizen-skeptic, and citizen-curious
Wired
Essential reading. Even if you feel you can trudge through verbal bullsh!t easily enough, this book will give you the tools to swim through numerical snake-oil. . .
Simon Ings, The Telegraph
Each of us now swims through deception so pervasive that we no longer realize it's there. Calling Bullshit presents a master class in how to spot it, how to resist it, and how to keep it from succeeding
Paul Romer, Nobel Laureate
If I could make this critical handbook's contents required curriculum for every high school student (thus replacing trigonometry), then I would do so. I highly recommend Calling Bullshit for our modern existence in the age of misinformation
Cathy O’Neil, author of Weapons of Math Destruction
The information landscape is strewn with quantitative cowflop; read this book if you want to know where not to step
Jordan Ellenberg, author of How Not to be Wrong
I laughed, I cried -- to read Bergstrom and West's great examples of 'bullshit.' This is a gripping read for anybody who cares about how we are fooled (and how not to be), and the connection to numeracy and science. But it's also just great fun. This is a necessary book for our times
Saul Perlmutter, Nobel Laureate
A helpful guide to navigating a world full of doubtful claims based on spurious data. Using clever anecdotes, nods to online culture and allusions to ancient philosophy, the book tells ordinary readers how to spot nonsense-even if they are not numerical whizzes
The Economist